What is the difference between background and background-color – Dev

The best answers to the question “What is the difference between background and background-color” in the category Dev.

QUESTION:

What’s the difference between specifying a background color using background and background-color?

Snippet #1

body { background-color: blue; }

Snippet #2

body { background: blue; }

ANSWER:

background will supercede all previous background-color, background-image, etc. specifications. It’s basically a shorthand, but a reset as well.

I will sometimes use it to overwrite previous background specifications in template customizations, where I would want the following:

background: white url(images/image1.jpg) top left repeat;

to be the following:

background: black;

So, all parameters (background-image, background-position, background-repeat) will reset to their default values.

ANSWER:

Premising that those are two distinct properties, in your specific example there’s no difference in the result, since background actually is a shorthand for

background-color  
background-image  
background-position  
background-repeat  
background-attachment  
background-clip  
background-origin  
background-size

Thus, besides the background-color, using the background shorthand you could also add one or more values without repeating any other background-* property more than once.

Which one to choose is essentially up to you, but it could also depend on specific conditions of your style declarations (e.g if you need to override just the background-color when inheriting other related background-* properties from a parent element, or if you need to remove all the values except the background-color).

ANSWER:

With background you can set all background properties like:

  • background-color
  • background-image
  • background-repeat
  • background-position
    etc.

With background-color you can just specify the color of the background

background: url(example.jpg) no-repeat center center #fff;

VS.

background-image: url(example.jpg);
background-position: center center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-color: #fff;

More info

(See Caption: Background – Shorthand property)

ANSWER:

About CSS performance :

background vs background-color :

Comparison of 18 color swatches rendered 100 times on a page as small
rectangles, once with background and once with background-color.

Background vs background-color

While these numbers are from a single page reload, with subsequent
refreshes the render times changed, but the percent difference was
basically the same every time.

That’s a savings of almost 42.6ms, almost twice as fast, when using
background instead of background-color in Safari 7.0.1. Chrome 33
appears to be about the same.

This honestly blew me away because for the longest time for two reasons:

  • I usually always argue for explicitness in CSS properties, especially with backgrounds because it can adversely affect specificity down the road.
  • I thought that when a browser sees background: #000;, they really see background: #000 none no-repeat top center;. I don’t have a link to a resource here, but I recall reading this somewhere.

Ref : https://github.com/mdo/css-perf#background-vs-background-color